The reason "it's just the nature of them" feels so final is because it's answering the wrong question.
The question these women have been asking, and the question cryotherapy, IPL, and home removal methods have been answering, is: how do I remove what's already here?
That's not the question that matters. The question that matters is: what are these growths physically made of, and what actually works on that structure across all of them at once?
The answer comes down to two things nobody mentions in the standard dermatologist conversation.
The keratin structure of each individual growth.
Seborrhoeic keratoses develop a thickened, heavily keratinised surface. Not surface discolouration. Not ordinary rough skin. A physically dense, compacted structure.
Which means products formulated for normal skin turnover are working against something fundamentally different from the skin around it. The surrounding skin may get smoother. The growth stays hard.
The keratin-softening sequence.
This is the piece almost nobody in the skincare conversation names explicitly. Instead of simply exfoliating the surface harder, the structure needs to be approached in sequence.
First, the hardened keratin has to be softened. Then the compacted surface buildup has to be broken down. Then the compacted buildup underneath has to be loosened so it can gradually shed.
And all of that requires sustained contact.
A wash disappears almost immediately. A pad gets wiped across the surface and is gone. Many creams spread into the surrounding skin before spending meaningful time against the hardened growth itself.
So the problem isn't simply finding a stronger exfoliant.
It's not the wrong chemistry. It's the wrong delivery.
It's getting the right sequence against the hardened keratin, and keeping it there long enough to work.
That's the distinction that eventually led these women away from another removal session, another generic cream, or another home experiment.
And toward a very different kind of leave-on formula.